The War Room
“Where is love more glorified than when she dwells in the midst of her enemies?.” - Dietrich Bonhoeffer
___________________________________________
As Christians, our scriptures tell us that God sides with the poor and oppressed, that He doesn’t even allow a sparrow to fall without good reason, and that His followers speak for the powerless - those who effectively have no voice. They will give up reputation to stand for a people or stop an unjust war, will give up comfort to preserve even the small things of their God’s creation, and will lose friends and support, defending both single mothers and unborn children. The issues are not simple, but because the Bible claims that God is love, we are told that we cannot even begin to understand Him until our hearts break and our worlds revolve around the same things as the heart of God.
According to Jesus, his work was to bring about a regime change that would affect everything from the youngest baby to the furthest star. When he asks us to “seek first the kingdom of God”, he is asking us to devote our lives to a kingdom that offends every financial, political and religious establishment in existence. Building the Kingdom of God is not pacifism, it is war to the deepest fibres of our being. “Love” is only a popular word when it is reduced to a bland sentiment; in reality it will never favour the powerful so it will only ever meet resistance. Because of this, Jesus’ concept of love was that of an unstoppable force, a tsunami of change that would overcome all barriers without being overcome by any form of compromise. “From the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful men lay hold of it” (Matt 11:12).
- ACTION -
Climate Change West Papua Peak Oil
“We and the world, my children, will always be at war.
Retreat is impossible.
Arm yourselves.”
Leif Enger
________________________________________________
- CAMPAIGN RESOURCES -
Calendar of Parliamentary Sittings
Contact details - House of Representatives
Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade
How to visit a politician - TEAR
“We will have to repent in this generation not merely for the hateful words and actions of the bad people, but for the appalling silence of the good people.”
Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.
- WHAT YOU CAN DO TODAY -
A January 2008 report by the United Nations looking into treatment of human rights defenders found in West Papua that
“…when defenders expose abuse of authority or other forms of human rights violations committed by the security apparatus, they are labeled as separatists in order to undermine their credibility…”. It also found that people who had been labelled in this way were at serious risk.
Indonesian law allows for imprisonment of separatists. This is a breach of human rights itself[1], but it is even worse when the so-called separatists are actually human rights defenders. As Australia’s “Lombok Treaty” with Indonesia commits us to “non support of separatism”, the international community will logically believe that we support Indonesia’s actions to suppress separatism unless we make it very clear that this is not the case. Australia needs to raise the UN report with President Yudhoyono in an international setting (consistent with the recommendations of the JSCOT report on the Lombok Treaty). We need to make it clear that we do not in any way support Indonesia’s actions, and offer assistance where necessary to combat the ongoing atmosphere of cruelty in West Papua.
Write, making these and any other points to any or all of:
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd,
Foreign Minister Steven Smith or
Member for Eden-Monaro & Secretary of Defence Mike Kelly
at PO Box 6022, House of Representatives, Parliament House,
Canberra ACT 2600
___________________________________________
“They’re advertising in the skies for people like us.” - U2
Building a Campaign
Use the diagram below to analyse what you need to achieve, then break your campaign down into the components described. Christian campaigning is not about being annoying, it is an effort to see God’s principles enacted on earth (”your will be done on earth as it is in heaven”), so a fully formed campaign needs to address the areas described here and follow these basic principles even if they are expressed differently.
You will almost certainly not be able to deal with all of these facets at once, but if you are passionate about the issue then make a start and as you progress and see the needs developing, pray and look for others that can specialise in the different areas. Each box is descibed below the diagram in greater detail.
- Learn. Research the facts from reliable sources. Find all sides of the story and why it hasn’t been fixed
- Educate. Expose the story - injustice thrives in an atmosphere of silence (John 3:19). Tell people, make posters, flyers, websites, write to newspapers and relevant authorities that should be made aware. Speak at schools, churches, community groups.
- Find Solutions. Justice is more about making things right than punishing wrong-doers. Do your research, talk to experts; get people talking together.
- Advocate. Be a loud voice for those who have none. Visit, email, write to those responsible for the wrong and call them to account. Offer solutions, organise and offer help, insist on good reasons why action has not been taken. Educate and call on others (church, community, community leaders, and international community) to advocate. Expose the inaction of those responsible. Write to newspapers, call radio stations; buy advertising time. Do not manipulate or blackmail - the end is inherent in the means.
- Intercede. The first step beyond “reasonable action” and the point where we can really start to glimpse God’s heart. To intercede is to “stand in the gap”; to draw fire from the attacker so that their focus is taken from the victim. Advocate to the point that you ignore the unjust warnings and incur the anger of the abuser, but make sure they are being provoked by your good actions and that you give them no other reason. They will cause you pain - respond with love (Matt 5: 38-48). “…the only ultimate way to conquer evil is to let it be smothered within a willing, living human being. When it is absorbed there like blood in a sponge or a spear into one’s heart, it loses it’s power and goes no further” (Old priest quoted by M. Scott Peck). When an innocent intercessor incurs the injustice of an aggressor and responds by returning love for hate, they draw the world’s attention to the situation and awaken the sense of justice that God has created in everyone. The more Christ-like their action and the darker the hatred directed against them, the more the eyes of everyone are opened - able now to both reject the cruel actions and love the character of God that they see in you.
- Reconcile. The final and possibly most difficult step, yet central to the work of a Christian (2 Cor 5:18-20). Once justice has been achieved, the abuser needs to be forgiven and restored. Both abuser and abused are loved equally by God so you must first reconcile where possible with the abuser, then advocate on their behalf to the ones they have hurt. Look for healing for the broken on both sides, pray, listen, encourage, organise physical help. When both sides are reconciled, then both sides are free.
When can our action be called ‘Christian’?
Adapted from “A Christian response to global warming part one”
-
Christian action is defined by love. Love is the fulfilment of the law (Matt 22:37-39), the mark of a true believer (John 13:35) and without it we cannot begin to understand God, because God is love (1 John 4:8). Any teaching that down-plays love or makes it out to be less important is not Biblical.
- Biblical love is not sentiment but a bold and selfless commitment to put the welfare of others ahead of one’s own (1 John 3:16). Christian action will consider the welfare of others above our own interests. It will not treat one race or religion more kindly than another (Romans 10:12), will not care less for anyone because of their perceived or actual moral failings (1 Peter 4:8), and will not exclude others because of fear of being hurt by them (Matt 5:43-48). There are other philosophies and descriptions of love that are similar, but the difference is the lengths which we are asked to go to. Human philosophy gives personal fulfillment, the escape from emotional turmoil or some other personal gain as the motivation for love. Biblical love is modelled on Christ - it gives to the other regardless of cost to the giver and looks for no reward, be it physical or emotional (II Cor 12:15); with one exception. It is only when we make the attempt to love that we can begin to understand the heart of God (1 John 4:7-8). Because of this, Biblical love goes beyond the natural, reasonable and normal: it is concerned with the extraordinary because it is driven by the extraordinary possibility of deeper relationship with God Himself.
- Love evokes emotion, but it is not in itself an emotional response. If it is Biblical, a course of action will be informed, rational and wise (Phil 1:9). It must take into account all of the relevant science, history and other facts and process them in an atmosphere of faith that God can care for us even if the way ahead is difficult.
- A Christian response recognises that the Bible is God-inspired (II Tim 3:16), so it will accept the authority of the Bible when there is a clear clash with other claims.
- A Christian response is humble, recognising our own limits and deferring to those with abilities we don’t have ourselves (Romans 12:3).
- A Christian response is not bound by culture. For example, despite the present culture to the contrary it recognises our God-given responsibility to care for the environment, that creation is an expression of God’s character (Rom 1:20) and that we will be asked to give account for our stewardship of everything God has given into our care (Matt 25:14-30). This places a weightier responsibility on us to care for the environment than that recognised by the secular community.
“Things have come to a pretty pass when religion is allowed to invade public life”
Lord Melbourne, in opposition to William Wilberforce’s Bill for the Abolition of Slavery
……………………………………………..
“Is not this the kind of fasting I have chosen: to loose the chains of injustice and untie the cords of the yoke, to set the oppressed free and break every yoke? Is it not to share your food with the hungry and to provide the poor wanderer with shelter— when you see the naked, to clothe him, and not to turn away from your own flesh and blood?
Then your light will break forth like the dawn, and your healing will quickly appear; then your righteousness will go before you, and the glory of the LORD will be your rear guard.”
Isaiah 58: 6-8
“God is in the slums, in the cardboard boxes where the poor play house… God is in the silence of a mother who has infected her child with a virus that will end both their lives… God is in the cries heard under the rubble of war… God is in the debris of wasted opportunity and lives, and God is with us if we are with them.”Bono (Lead Singer U2)
“Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
“The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’”
Matt 25:34-40
Oh, what’ll you do now, my blue-eyed son?
Oh, what’ll you do now, my darling young one?
I’m a-goin’ back out ‘fore the rain starts a-fallin’,
I’ll walk to the depths of the deepest black forest,
Where the people are many and their hands are all empty,
Where the pellets of poison are flooding their waters,
Where the home in the valley meets the damp dirty prison,
Where the executioner’s face is always well hidden,
Where hunger is ugly, where souls are forgotten,
Where black is the color, where none is the number,
And I’ll tell it and think it and speak it and breathe it,
And reflect it from the mountain so all souls can see it,
Then I’ll stand on the ocean until I start sinkin’,
But I’ll know my song well before I start singin’,
And it’s a hard, it’s a hard, it’s a hard, it’s a hard,
It’s a hard rain’s a-gonna fall.
Bob Dylan (Hard Rain)


Comment from Pete Ridley:
Phil (Stormboy), I forgot to mention that you still haven’t posted my comment about religion on your evangelical site bloodwoodtree blog “The War Room”. Perhaps you’re concerned that some of your more impressionable readers might be persuaded that there is even less evidence for believing the “benevolent super power” hypothesis that there is for believing the “Significant Human-made Global Climate Change” hypothesis.
August 23rd, 2009 at 4:46 pmI’ll post my comment here in case you’ve lost it, QUOTE:
As mentioned on Senator Fielding’s “The real reason I’ll fight in the Senate on climate change” blog, here are a few points on the abortion issue that I ‘d like to debate here:
1) I assume that you believe that neither a sperm nor an unfertilised egg are “humans”, so at what stage do you believe that they become so and on what scientific evidence do you base this?
2) what scientific evidence led you do you decide that there is “life after death”?
3) what evidence led you to decide that those supporting “pro-choice” tend to be politically left wing and those against abortion right wing (or have I misunderstood you)? UNQUOTE
Nothing too contentious at this stage, but I’d really like to get into much more detail at some stage, just like in the debate on how our use of fossil fuels has negligible impact upon global climates.
Pete, I’ll have a go at answering those for you.
1) As with any other species, I believe that the new life begins at fertilisation or conception; a fertilised human egg is a young human. I admit that I can’t quote you any papers to prove this, mainly because I think it’s pretty broadly accepted that a new life won’t begin in a woman without a male to fertilise her egg.
2) No scientific evidence led me to believe in life after death, it’s not something that is measurable by science and is by definition a matter of faith. Your comparison to climate change science falls down in this regard - climate science is observable and testable. We can’t do the same for faith issues - what someone believes about life after death is entirely a matter of choice. The belief that life after death is not real is equally a faith decision - you can’t test it any more than I can test my own. Some people claim to have near death experiences but I personally don’t accept these as evidence because they are attempts to measure the infinite with finite observation. The human mind can convince its owner of all sorts of things that aren’t real.
3)I’m not sure what the situation is in the UK, but in Australia our larger right wing parties over the past decade or so (Liberal, Nationals, Christian Democrats, Family First) have been more vocally opposed to abortion and stem-cell research, whereas our left-wing parties (Greens, Democrats and some of the Labour Party) have been quite strongly “pro-choice”. Likewise in the US, right wing Republicans tend to be pro-life, left wing Democrat policies tend to be pro-choice.
What are your thoughts Pete?
August 23rd, 2009 at 5:19 pmWhat I would give to meet Bono…how awesome would that be!
April 20th, 2010 at 4:42 pmDuring our 2nd year of marriage, my hubby and I encountered ourselves out of college and laid-off. Neither of us could get jobs in our area. So, neither one of us were able to even get full time jobs as the economy was terrible and for the first time in my lifetime I started hearing people talking about the unfortunate, food shelters, etc. As we struggled to make ends meet, with not 1 but 3 part time jobs cleaning offices (we got runs together as we solely had one car and ran to 3 different locations all night long ending up about 3 a.m.), I think of a short period when matters got a bit “tense”. In the midst of all of this, my husband suddenly quietly asked me if I wanted a divorce and that stopped me in my tracks. I gulped and began to cry as he promptly assured me that wasn’t what he wanted either but it was time for us to make a commitment. For near 29 years (next month), this has entailed that we have NO different option. We are sworn to this and therefore we must continually bring our spousal relationship under the protection of the very source of matrimony itself, God!
August 20th, 2010 at 8:26 am